Return to Rainbow City Home Page
usaWHT_rd3003
Fireman Study Report

get_adobe_readerTo Print This Study click here for the PDF file format.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AN ORGANIZATIONAL

 

AND MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT

 

 OF THE

 

RAINBOW CITY, ALABAMA,

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Condrey and Associates, Inc.

PO Box 7907

Athens, Georgia 30604-7907

www.condrey-consulting.com


 

Table of contents

 

INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1

 

ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW............................................................................................... 1

        Organizational Structure..................................................................................................... 1

        Staffing and Overtime Expense ......................................................................................... 2

        Fair Labor Standards Act Compliance............................................................................... 3

 

PERFORMANCE AND BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS.................................................... 6

        Staffing Comparison........................................................................................................... 7

        Expenditure Comparison.................................................................................................... 8

        Service Comparison............................................................................................................ 8

        Conclusion And Recommendations................................................................................... 9

 

SUMMARY

        Appendix A:  Peer Group 1................................................................................................ 2

        Appendix B: Performance Measurement Terminology....................................................... 2

        Appendix C: Fire Department Characteristics – FY 2003 to FY 2005.............................. 2

        Appendix D: Peer Group 2 Comparison............................................................................. 2

        Appendix E: National Comparison..................................................................................... 2

 


INTRODUCTION

 

         At the request of the City of Rainbow City, Condrey and Associates, Inc. entered into a contract with the city to conduct an organizational and management assessment of the Rainbow City Fire Department. The objectives of the study included:

1.     Reviewing the organizational structure and overall management of the Rainbow City                            Fire Department;

         2.     Conducting an FLSA and overtime application review and assessment;

3.         Providing on-site subject matter experts to achieve 1 and 2 above;

4.     Conducting a benchmarking analysis of the department’s operations; and

5.         Providing a written report outlining findings and recommendations.

         In April 2005, representatives of Condrey and Associates met with Rainbow City officials for information exchange, delivery of employee position questionnaires, and preparation of a tentative work schedule.  In May 2005, Condrey and Associates conducted on-site interviews with fire personnel, city officials, and city staff members including the City Clerk and Payroll Clerk.  Additionally, Condrey and Associates collected and analyzed information concerning

the operation of comparable fire departments on a state and national basis.  It should be noted that all Rainbow City personnel conducted themselves in a professional and courteous manner, and were helpful in the information gathering process for this study.

 

ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW

 

Organizational Structure

        The current organizational structure of the Fire Department includes a Fire Chief, Fire Marshal (at the time of report preparation, the Acting Fire Chief), three Assistant Chiefs, six Station Captains, three Lieutenants, and nine Firefighters. The current structure appears appropriate at present; however, the City may wish to consider phasing out the position of Lieutenant through attrition and replacing it with the position of Firefighter II.  Additionally, the City may wish to consider adopting National Firefighter Professional Qualifications (NFPQ) guidelines allowing for a career ladder (rank in person rather than in position) for entry-level firefighters to move to the position of Firefighter II based on individual development objectives.  Phasing out the position of Lieutenant and replacing it with the career ladder position of Firefighter II will flatten the department’s organizational structure, reducing the fire officer supervision ratio from 14:9 to 11:12 and bringing the Department closer to state and national norms concerning rank structure (see Table I).

 

Staffing and Overtime Expense

         The fire department currently maintains a minimum staffing of seven (7) personnel per shift for a total of twenty-one (21) positions.  In order to maintain this staffing level, off-duty personnel are required to work in place of any on-duty absences resulting from time off for sick leave, vacation leave and other reasons.  For the past fiscal year, the Fire Department experienced $258,683 in overtime pay with a total of 22 employees in the department.  This expense is 23% of all personnel expenditures for the department and represents a department average overtime expenditure of $12,318 per eligible employee.  For the same period, the Rainbow City Police Department experienced $247,760 in overtime pay; 18% of payroll with a total of 33 department employees ($7,742 average per eligible employee).  It is interesting to note, that after overtime expense is added to base pay, the Acting Fire Chief was the fifth lowest paid employee of the Rainbow City Fire Department for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

         Under the current staffing arrangement, if an Assistant Fire Chief is off duty for an assigned shift, another Assistant Fire Chief is called in to work that shift at an overtime rate.  In such instances, Condrey and Associates recommends having one Captain function as the Officer in charge for that shift and calling back a firefighter in order to maintain the minimum staffing level in the department. Condrey and Associates also recommends that the Department retain certified fire personnel from other departments that will be willing to work vacant shifts as necessary.  These part-time personnel would only be compensated for the time they work with the City; this compensation would be at a regular rather than an overtime rate. An alternative to employing part-time personnel and regular employees on an overtime basis is to place all fire personnel on a rotating, paid on-call basis, and only call these personnel in to work if necessitated by a significant incident (assuring the City will meet OSHA safety standards).  Any combination of these three staffing alternatives should significantly reduce department overtime expense.

Fair Labor Standards Act Compliance

            Rainbow City currently compensates all employees of the Fire Department, except for the acting Fire Chief, with overtime pay on a weekly basis.  Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, certified fire personnel qualify for the 207k partial exemption.  Under this provision, the work period may be extended up to a maximum of 28 days for the entire work cycle.  Our recommendation is to pay any overtime worked by certified fire department personnel, who are non-exempt under FLSA, on a 28-day work cycle.  Rainbow City would continue to pay the normal hourly rate of pay each weekly pay period and would only pay overtime every 4th pay period (at the end of the 28-day work cycle).  The maximum number of hours worked before being paid overtime is 212 hours in a 28-day work cycle.  Under the current work schedule of 24 hours on duty and 48 hours off duty,  fire personnel will work either 216 hours (with four hours overtime) during the 28-day work cycle, or 240 hours (with 28 hours overtime) during the 28-day work cycle.  There will be two shifts on the 216-hour schedule, and one shift on the 240-hour work schedule in each 28-day cycle.     

            All employees of the Fire Department currently receive 156 hours per year of overtime pay in their “regular” work schedule.  By changing fire personnel to the 28-day pay cycle, the maximum overtime hours to be paid for their “regular” work schedule is 148 hours.  If fire personnel take leave (vacation or sick) during the 28-day work cycle, the law allows the employee to be paid at straight time rate instead of at the overtime hourly rate, thereby reducing the threshold of the overtime rate.[1]  Changing to a 28-day pay cycle should allow for a departmental overtime savings of over $25,000 per year.

         After reviewing the City’s current FLSA designations for the Fire Department, it appears that the position of Assistant Fire Chief may be exempt under overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  The City Attorney (in conjunction with a labor attorney specializing in Fair Labor Standards Act compliance) should review this position for a final determination of


exemption status.  The current job description for the position of Assistant Chief includes the following functions that fall into the Executive Exempt category:

·      Commands one of the three (3) platoons of fire suppression personnel and the two (2) fire stations.

·         Responds to emergencies and assumes command, coordinates and supervises the emergency operations of all companies involved in fire suppression, rescue, and other emergencies.

·         Coordinates the activities of a platoon in order to maintain and support the operation of department equipment, apparatus, and plant facilities so as to insure operational readiness and longevity.

·         Plans and coordinates the effective use of human resources in an effort to help meet departmental objectives and goals.

·         Insures that departmental policies, procedures, rules and regulations are implemented and maintained.

·         Participates in selection, disciplinary action, and other conclusive personnel actions.

·         Participates in planning, organizing, training, fiscal management and the administration of employee relations and the Equal Employment Opportunity policies of the department.

·         Plans, organizes, and prepares special reports or projects as required by the Fire Chief.

·         Coordinates and approves leave of assigned personnel in order to insure that adequate minimum staffing levels are maintained.

·         Performs other management functions as directed by the Fire Chief.

         Based on information provided by the Acting Fire Chief and interviews with Department personnel (conducted by a subject matter expert with significant experience in fire operations and management), the following duties were confirmed as being performed by the position of Assistant Fire Chief: 

·         Commands a shift (includes both stations)

·         Frequently exercises discretion and independent judgment

·         Supervises six (6) employees on each shift

·         Regularly utilizes supervisory authority

·         Makes hiring recommendations (discusses with Fire Chief)

·         Makes termination recommendations (discusses with Fire Chief)

·         Makes promotional recommendations (discusses with Fire Chief)

·         Reviews disciplinary actions taken by the Captain; recommends resolution to the Fire Chief

·         Trains subordinate employees

·         Responds to employee grievances

·         Allocates work among employees

·         Works under the very general supervision of the Fire Chief

         If the City Attorney, in consultation with a labor attorney specializing in FLSA compliance, concur that the position of Assistant Fire Chief is exempt from overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the potential direct savings in overtime compensation based on the previous year’s experience is approximately $50,000.  This amount would be offset by the cost to hire part-time personnel, call back other lower-ranked personnel, or to require personnel to be placed on call and only called back to duty as needed.

                        


   PERFORMANCE AND BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS

 

As part of our review of the Rainbow City Fire Department, we conducted a performance and benchmarking analysis of Fire Department services.  The benefits of performance measures are widely recognized in the management literature.  Performance measures provide a means of defining program service levels both at the operating level and the strategic level.  Additionally, performance measures can clarify expectations and provide a rational methodology to report and track program accomplishments to managers, citizens, and policymakers.[2]

Benchmarking is a management tool to compare performance measures.  Benchmarking allows management and employees the opportunity to see the results of their efforts.  Managers can identify service areas where they are performing well, can improve performance in service areas where their performance is below that of comparable jurisdictions, and have data to assist in decision making.

The benchmarking analysis for the City of Rainbow City utilizes three peer groups.   Peer Group 1 provides a statewide comparison that includes all Alabama municipalities participating in the Auburn University’s Center for Governmental Services Alabama League of Municipalities 2004 Alabama Municipal Salary and Benefits Survey for Municipalities over 2000 Population  (July 2004).  Participants are shown in Appendix A.  Peer Group 2 provides a local comparison by utilizing municipal fire districts selected by the City of Rainbow City Acting Fire Chief.  Peer Group 2 includes the cities of Attalla, Boaz, Gardendale, Guntersville, and Mountain Brook.  Peer Group 3 provides a national comparison by including participants in the International City County Manager’s Association’s Center for Performance Measurement’s Eighth Annual Report (November 2004).

The benchmark comparison includes measures at the organization level that demonstrate results (efficiency, effectiveness, and equity); are limited; responds to multiple priorities; and link to responsible programs.   Data was collected internally and externally.  Appendix B defines specific terminology used in the discussion.

Staffing Comparison

The purpose of the City of Rainbow City Fire Department is to provide the best combined fire and rescue services to the citizens and visitors of Rainbow City, Alabama, at the most economical rate to the taxpayers.   To accomplish this purpose, the department has twenty-two (22) active full-time positions.  The total combined budget for the Fire Department and the Fire Protection Fund for the 2005 Fiscal Year is $1,508,894.  The capital expenditure budget for the department for the 2005 Fiscal Year is $368,052.

            In order to comparatively assess the city’s fire department staffing with other municipalities, we measured the full-time equivalents (FTEs) as a factor of population.  For example, the U.S. Department of Labor uses a comparison of FTEs per 10,000 population.   Thus, 22 employees for Rainbow City’s population of 8,428 equals 26.10 employees per 10,000 residents.   This rate compares to the U.S. Department of Labor mean of 10.98 employees and the 23.68 select comparison of local Alabama city average of employees.  Specifically, the City of Rainbow City’s 26.10 rate compares with Attalla’s 27.3, Boaz’s 18.9, Gardendale’s 23.7, Guntersville’s 31.1, Mountain Brook’s 30.1. 

 

Table 1: Rainbow City Staffing Comparison to Multiple Peer Groups

 

Rainbow City

Mean

Median

FTEs per 10,000 population – U.S. Department of Labor

 

All Fire - All Alabama jurisdictions

26.10

10.98

NA

FTEs per 10,000 population – Alabama Comparison Peer Group 1

 

Assistant Fire Chief (n=28)

3.55

2.34

1.27

 

Fire Captain (n=51)

7.12

2.84

2.52

 

Fire Lieutenant

3.56

3.49

3.98

 

Firefighter / Paramedic

8.30

5.94

5.73

FTEs per 10,000 population – Alabama Comparison Peer Group 2

 

Assistant Fire Chief

3.55

2.52

2.52

 

Fire Captain

7.12

4.30

4.05

 

Fire Lieutenant

3.56

3.78

3.78

 

All Fire Personnel

26.10

23.68

26.70

FTEs per 1,000 population (ICMA Survey FY 2003)

 

Under 100,000 population – Fire Only

2.61

1.04

1.30

 

Under 100,000 population – Fire & EMS

2.61

1.48

1.49

 

All population – Fire & EMS

2.61

1.61

1.50

 

 

Nationally, the comparative ICMA measure for Rainbow City’s 2.61 employees per 1,000 population (a different ratio) compares to a national average of 1.61 employees per 1,000 population.

            We also compared the number of position classifications between departments.  The City of Rainbow City has more positions per 10,000 population than the average for the classifications of Assistant Fire Chief, Fire Captain, Fire Lieutenant, and Firefighter / Paramedic as compared to Peer Group 1 (all Alabama municipalities).  Table 1 shows the comparison.  

         We also measured minimum staffing for in-service equipment as compared to national averages. The City of Rainbow City appears in line or slightly below the national mean and median.  Comparatively, the City of Rainbow City staffs in-service equipment for ladder trucks at 3.0 employees to the national mean of 3.2 employees per truck.  The city maintains a staffing level of two employees for pumpers / engines compared to the national mean of 2.8 employees.

Expenditure Comparison

In order to access the cost of providing fire and rescue services, we measured audited fire department expenditures per capita.  For example, the city’s audited operating and capital expenditures for fiscal year 2003 of $2,041,757 equals $242.25 per capita. The audited operating expenditures for fiscal year 2003 of $1,574,301 equal $186.79 per capita.  Comparatively, the audited 2003 fiscal year totals for the select group of Alabama municipalities were Boaz’s $106.35, Gardendale’s $42.30 (mostly volunteer), Guntersville’s $145.75, and Mountain Brook’s $225.85.[3] Nationally, expenditures for personnel and operations per capita for fire departments with no volunteers is $114.85 per capita.   Rainbow City’s per capita expenditures were higher across the comparison peer groups during the audited period analyzed.

Service Comparison

The service comparison incorporates standard measurements that are used nationally.  We also surveyed the select local group of Alabama cities to gather the same indicators. The City of Rainbow City appears to be in line with national and local comparisons and services.  Appendix D shows the local comparison and Appendix E shows the national comparison. 


The city records superior performance means in the following:

·         Total residential structure fire incidents

·         Total residential structure fire incidents (confined to structure of origin)

·         Total non-fire incidents per 1,000 population

·         Arson and arson clearance rate

·         Fire performance injuries with time lost per 1,000 incidents

·         Rescues and recovers performed per 10,000 population (technical incidents); and

·         Percentage of fire response times under five minutes from dispatch to arrival (all calls)

The city records performance measures less than the national means in the following:

·         Fire personnel and operating expenditures per capita (total)

·         Fire personnel and operating expenditures per capita for departments with no  volunteers; and

·         Total fire incidents per 1,000 population served

The city’s capital assets are in line with national means for municipal fire departments.

 

Conclusion and Recommendations

In summary, the city exceeds national, regional, and local performance measures in service delivery.  However, the department’s per capita expenditures are high when compared to these same groups (see Appendices D and E).  This high cost can be primarily attributed to excessive overtime expenditures, not a higher departmental staffing level.  Therefore, the recommendations in this report should reduce departmental overtime expenditures while allowing the department to maintain the same high level of service to the citizens of Rainbow City.  In summary Condrey and Associates recommends:

1.      Phase out the position of Lieutenant through attrition to bring the department closer to state and national staffing ratios related to supervision.

2.      Adopt a career ladder policy allowing firefighters to move from the position of Firefighter I to Firefighter II based on professional development criteria.

3.      Recruit certified fire personnel to serve on an as-needed, part-time basis.  This policy will reduce overtime costs associated with shift absences.

4.      Allow the Department to fill shift absences with positions of lower rank.  For example, a Fire Captain would act as Assistant Chief on an assigned shift instead of calling in another Assistant Chief to fill the shift vacancy.  Such a policy will allow for the further professional development of Department personnel while reducing overtime expenditures.

5.      Consider a paid on-call status as a means of covering shift absences.

6.      Switch to a 28-day pay cycle as allowed by the Fair Labor Standards Act.

7.      The City Attorney, in consultation with a labor attorney specializing in FLSA compliance, should consider whether or not the position of Assistant Fire Chief is exempt from overtime compensation as outlined in the Fair Labor Standards Act guidelines issued August 2004.

Implementing the above recommendations will allow the department to continue to provide a high level of service to the citizens of Rainbow City, but at a cost level that is more in keeping with state and national standards.

                                                                            

 

 


 

Appendix A

Peer Group 1:
Alabama Municipalities Participating in Annual Salary Survey

 

 

 

CITY NAME

POPULATION

 

CITY NAME

POPULATION

Alabaster

22,619

 

Jacksonville

8,404

Albertville

17,247

 

Jasper

14,052

Alexander City

15,008

 

Lafayette

3,234

Andaulsia

8,794

 

Leeds

10,455

Anniston

24,276

 

Madison

29,329

Ashville

2,260

 

Midfield

5,626

Atmore

7,676

 

Millbrook

10,386

Bay Minette

7,820

 

Mobile

198,915

Bessemer

29,672

 

Montgomery

201,568

Boaz

7,411

 

Muscle Shoals

11,924

Brewton

5,498

 

Northport

19,435

Childersburg

4,297

 

Opelika

23,498

Cullman

13,995

 

Ozark

15,119

Dadeville

3,212

 

Pelham

14,369

Daphne

16,581

 

Pell City

9,565

Decatur

53,929

 

Phenix City

28,265

Demopolis

7,540

 

Piedmont

5,120

Dothan

57,737

 

Prichard

28,633

East Brewton

2,496

 

Rainbow City

8,428

Enterprise

21,178

 

Rainsville

4,499

Eufaula

13,908

 

Russellville

8,971

Foley

7,590

 

Samson

2,071

Fort Payne

12,938

 

Saraland

12,288

Gadsden

38,978

 

Satsmusa

5,687

Gardendale

11,626

 

Sheffield

9,652

Graysville

2,344

 

Sumilton

2,665

Greenville

7,228

 

Sylacauga

12,616

Gulf Shores

5,044

 

Talladega

15,143

Guntersville

7,395

 

Tarrant

7,022

Harselle

12,019

 

Troy

13,935

Hoover

62,742

 

Trussville

12,924

Hueytown

15,364

 

Tuscaloosa

77,906

Huntsville

158,216

 

Vestavia Hills

24,476

Irondale

9,813

 

Winfield

4,540

 

SOURCE: Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University and Alabama League of Municipalities.  2004 Alabama Municipal Salary and Benefits Survey for Municipalities over 2000 Population.  July 2004.

 


 

 

Appendix B

 

Performance Measurement Terminology[4]

 

 

Terminology

Definition

Examples

Input

Value of resources used to produce an output

·          Dollars budgeted/spent

·          Staff hours used

Output

Quantity or number of units produced

Outputs are activity-oriented, measurable, and usually under managerial control

Workload indicators, which are external drivers of the city’s effort, are a subset of output indicators

 

Output:

·         Eligibility interviews conducted

·         Library books checked out

·         Children immunized

·         Prisoners boarded

·         Purchase orders issued

 

Workload:

·         Number of clients requesting service

Efficiency

Inputs used per unit of output

·          Plans reviewed per reviewer

·          Cost per appraisal

Service Quality

 

Degree to which customers are satisfied with a program, or how accurately or timely a service is provided

 

·          Percent of respondents satisfied with service

·          Error rate per data entry operator

·          Frequency of repeat repairs

·          Average days to address a facility work order

Outcome

Qualitative consequences associated with a program or service. External forces can sometimes limit managerial control. Outcome focuses on the ultimate “why” of providing a service

 

·         Reduction in fire deaths/injuries

·         Percent of job trainees who hold a job for more than six months

·         Percent of juveniles not reconvicted within 12 months

·         Adoption/redemption rate of impounded animals

Median

Denoting the middle term of a series arranged in order of magnitude, or (if there is no middle term) the average of the middle two terms

For example, the median number of the series 55, 62, 76, 85, 93 is 76.

Mean

the quotient of the sum of several quantities and their number; an average

Mathematical Average

Appendix C

Fire Department Characteristics – Fiscal Years 2003 - 2005

CHARACTERISTICS

Fiscal Year

FY 2003

FY 2004

 

FY 2005

Residential Population

8,428

8,428

8,428

Total Full Time Employees

22

22

22

Total operating budget

2,041,757

1,501,694

 

1,508,894

ISO Rating

5

5

5

Square miles served

26

26

26

Population density per square mile

324

324

325

Land use of square miles served

 

Agricultural / open space

10

10

10

 

Residential

9

9

9

 

Commercial / Industrial

7

7

7

Services provided to area

 

Fire suppression services

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

EMS

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

Technical rescue services

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

Hazardous materials response

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

Automatic aid

No

No

No

 

Fire vehicle maintenance

No

No

No

 

Dispatch center management

No

No

No

 

Building permit issuance

No

No

No

Number of Stations

 

Fire suppression stations

2

2

2

Equipment

 

Number of ladder trucks

 

 

 

 

In-service

1

1

1

 

Reserve

1

1

1

 

Number of pumpers/engines

 

 

 

 

In-service

3

3

3

 

Reserve

2

2

2

 

Number of quints / comb

 

 

 

 

In-service

0

0

0

 

Reserve

0

0

0

 

Number of ambulances

 

 

 

 

In-service

0

0

0

 

Reserve

0

0

0

Minimum Staffing for in-service equipment

 

Ladder trucks

1

1

1

 

Pumpers / engines

5

5

5

 

Quints / comb

 

 

 

 

Medic truck

2

2

2

Total Residential Structures

5000

5000

5000

Total Residential Structure Fire Incidents

12

24

 

Total Commercial and Industrial Structures

474

474

474

Total Arson Incidents

0

0

NA

Total Responses

1003

1287

NA

Total number of responses where response times under five minutes from dispatch to arrival

1000

1280

NA

Total false alarms

63

41

NA

Total fire incidents

66

90

NA

Total fire incidents involving non-structures

51

64

NA

Total non-fire incidents

184

110

NA

Total rescues / technical

13

11

NA

Fire personnel injuries with time lost

0

0

NA

Fire personnel injuries hours lost

0

0

NA

Total residential structure fire incidents confined to room of origin

6

 

NA

Total residential structure fire incidents confined to structure of origin

12

24

NA

 


Appendix D

Peer Group 2 Comparison for Fiscal Year 2004

 

CITIES

Boaz

Mountain Brook

Guntersville

Rainbow City

 

Residential Population

7,411

20,604

7,395

8,428

 

Total Full-Time Employees

14

62

23

22

 

Total operating budget

750,000

4,000,000

1,213,500

1,501,694

 

ISO Rating

5

3

4

5

 

Square miles served

15

14

146

26

 

Population density per square mile

494

1,471

51

324

 

Land use of square miles served

 

Agricultural / open space

3

0

NA

19

 

 

Residential

8

13.5

NA

9

 

 

Commercial / Industrial

4

.5

NA

7

 

Services provided to area

 

Fire suppression services

Ö

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

 

EMS

Ö

Ö

Ö

Ö

 

 

Technical rescue services

Ö

No

Ö

Ö

 

 

Hazardous materials response

Ö

No

Ö

Ö

 

Number of Stations

 

Fire suppression stations

1

3

2

2

 

Number of ladder trucks

 

 

In-service

1

1

1

1

 

 

Reserve

1

1

1

1

 

Number of pumpers/engines

 

 

In-service

2

3

2                

3

 

 

Reserve

2

5

2

2

 

Total Residential Structures

3000

7998

NA

5000

 

Total Residential Structure Fire Incidents

18

15

72

24

 

Total Arson Incidents

6

0

7

0

 

Total Responses

1320

3073

1700

1287

 

Total number of responses where response times under five minutes from dispatch to arrival

1320

NA

700

1280

 

Total false alarms

71

50

80

41

 

Total fire incidents

86

59

350

90

 

Total fire incidents involving non-structures

62

44

275

64

 

Total non-fire incidents

1234

3000

1350

110

 

Total rescues / technical

46

0

23

11

 

Fire personnel injuries with time lost

0

NA

NA

0

 

Fire personnel injuries hours lost

0

1500

NA

0

 

Total residential structure fire incidents confined to room of origin

13

NA

NA

24

 


Appendix E

National Comparison using ICMA Survey Results

Benchmark Measurement

Rainbow City
(FY 2003 Audit)

Mean

Median

Equipment

 

Number of ladder trucks

1.0

1.0

1.0

 

 

In-service

1.0

1.0

1.0

 

 

Reserve

1.0

0.4

0.0

 

Number of pumpers/engines

 

 

 

 

 

In-service

3.0

4.2

4.5

 

 

Reserve

2.0

1.6

2.0

 

Number of quints / comb

 

 

 

 

 

In-service

0.0

0.7

0.0

 

 

Reserve

0.0

0.0

0.0

 

Number of ambulances

 

 

 

 

 

In-service

0.0

1.9

0.0

 

 

Reserve

0.0

0.8

0.0

Minimum Staffing for in-service equipment

 

Ladder trucks

3.0

3.2

3.0